I recently learned that my
undergraduate college, Chatham University, celebrating 145 years as a woman’s
college, is moving to go co-ed. I am as shocked as all my fellow alumnae and
current students and I understand their outrage. I’m right there with them. My
experience was unique and I would want to preserve that for future generations
as much as anyone.
But outrage and petitions are not
enough to “save Chatham.” I see these petitions—the posts on everyone’s
Facebook, the Facebook groups and pages, even the website savechatham.com—and all
I can think in reply is anger. I get it. Tradition, honor, women’s rights,
feminism, whatever. I don’t like the idea either. The problem I have is with
the complaining.
All of these women are fighting
against this action with no counter proposal. Do they even understand the
desperation that Chatham must be in that it would stoop to such a solution? The
economy is hurting, and Chatham is no different from any small business. In my
four years at Chatham, I noticed the classes getting smaller each year. I
noticed the students in my own year that transferred away. Tuition prices were
getting hundreds of dollars more expensive every semester. They gave
undergraduate housing to the graduates because, hey, they’re getting more of
those guys (and I mean, literally, men who are
allowed in the graduate program and lived in the undergraduate women’s dorm).
Allowing men into the undergraduate
institution could potentially “save Chatham” by giving Chatham more enrollers.
Even if you point out that similar colleges like Carlow who were all women and
went co-ed don’t have a large men population, if you want to compare Chatham to
other colleges why don’t you also compare it to the other private colleges that
closed due to bankruptcy?
For alumnae this problem doesn’t
really matter. But what about current and future enrolling students? Tuition is
already skyrocketing just to fill the gaps of enrollment. To compensate not
allowing men into the undergraduate program to increase class size, Chatham
will have to put more money into advertising for more young women. They will
have to spend more money on programs to appeal to them. That money will be
coming out of the students’ pockets more and more. And what do you think will
happen when going to a private college will cost more than $200,000 for a degree in a time where getting a job is
more about having the experience over
having education, even if it’s an entry level position? Enrollment will go
down. People will transfer. Tuition goes up to compensate. Enrollment goes down
again. Do you see where this is going? And don’t forget about the faculty. They’re
the ones that will get fired to save money. Fewer professors mean fewer classes
and fewer programs of study, which leads to less enrollment once again. Or the
campus will suffer. Maintenance will go down. Sports teams cut. Extra events
and activities cut. Residence halls consolidated. Chatham will be a shell of
what it once was. What’s the point of all these petitions if it’s going to lead
to the college closing down anyway?
If you really want to “Save Chatham”
you need to do more than share your opinion and your experience at Chatham
University for your other fellow alumnae and students to read and gush about
together. Your words will mean nothing if Chatham will have to close its
undergrad program entirely. If you really care, you need to use your precious Chatham education to
get a great job (good luck with that) so that you can donate to the school and become
a trustee. Or find new and willing trustees. Or help out with advertising so
that Chatham will get the biggest enrollment of women it’s seen in a decade. Volunteer
for something to help alleviate costs. Or propose something entirely new. Don’t
just sit there and complain.
As for my personal opinion on the
matter, I don’t see why allowing men into the undergraduate program is such a
big deal. I chose Chatham because it looked like a nice school with a great
environment and highly rated creative writing and English programs. My parents
were more comfortable with me going to an all-women’s college because they were
living on a military base in South Korea at the time, but I didn’t really care
if it was co-ed or women-only.
Honestly, Chatham has such a
feminist, forward-thinking environment, wouldn’t it be good to introduce more
men into it so that they can share and spread our ideology and cause? Maybe
Chatham will have a better reputation than being a bunch of lesbian feminists
who want to stay huddled together in the corner of Pittsburgh hating any and
all men. Maybe you don’t know that reputation? Being on a sports team, we
travelled a lot to other colleges, we’ve overheard the rumors. We are a
lesbo-school. Which isn’t actually untrue if you look at what they had to go on.
I mean, for my time on the team half of us were lesbians and all of us were
LGBT supportive. It was their attitude that pissed us off. But how can they
think of us any differently?
Chatham is a bubble. No one can
really wander our campus. The only things they really know about our school are
probably from the people who transferred out, and what nice things would those
people have to say? We aren’t like U. Pitt. where anyone can come and go as
they please. I’ve seen women who get antsy when they see groups of men on the
campus and will intentionally go the other direction. Or I’ve seen women who
would pounce on them like a hungry pack of wolves. I myself felt socially
awkward because I wasn’t used to being around guys. When I took graduate
classes in my senior year, we had a man in it, and I think it was much more
enlightening than having a class full of women. He applied a different perspective
that really helped everyone, as I’m sure our perspective helped him.
I don’t wish to get into the
politics about anything. This rant isn’t about feminists or being a feminist or
believing in feminism, however you define it. I would like to preserve Chatham
as much as the next woman, but only for its tradition. From a real world
standpoint, I think having a segregated college is archaic. Segregation and
isolation are historically unfavorable for the segregated/isolated side, so why
continue with it? What are the benefits in it that are more beneficial than
sharing our ideology and way of life to the other side? Like I said before, I
don’t want to get into politics, so I’ll finish that thought there.
Don’t get me wrong. I fully support
Chatham staying as a women’s college, but I just want to point out that if
Chatham needs to go co-ed in order to be functional, it wouldn’t be the end of
the world. In fact, it could be a new opportunity. The point of my argument was
to point out the flaws in the arguments of my friends and to provide my own
opinion on the matter of Chatham turning co-ed, and I think I effectively went
off on a few tangents there, so I will stop here.
This long rant brought to you by
Jennifer Murphy, Class of 2013.